@johndough247
i only have my experience on this, i have been told latency is the important bit, no personal
experience of experimenting with that. i cannot comment on ACC
the below is for my single 3440 x 1440 monitor, shocked by the fact that even though i was pushing
a lot less pixels, the FPS was just as difficult to stabilise as was my 144hz triples.
In fact i found matching FPS to triples, about the same.
gtx 1080
3440 x 1440 monitor
i5 6600k 4.7Ghz
bench mark:-
Av 214 Min 127 Max 273 Cpu 88%
Points 31438
Ram @ 2666 Mhz
As above with Ram at 3600
AV 245 Min 89 Max 297
Points 35969
pretty sure my latency was the same at 3600, C15
i have found that having a good system, yours is much better than mine does not mean you
can be cavalier in your approach to settings with triple monitors.
with triples, especially, i had to trim back every thing to the bare essentials, absolutely minimal
apps running, make sure that Nvidia inspector is not adding anything to your AC settings.
I ran with no PP setting, finally from my point of view when racing, it did not add anything to
the experience.
Shadows min, reflections at high, but frequency static, 16x world detail high, 4x, smoke low.
i think if memory serves me correctly, i got about 10 Fps gain from my memory clock.
Forgive my memory on this, but i do know, it was a matter of carefully examining every small
detail, and nit picking at the FPS until i had got it at the best i could from my setup.
Unfortunately i do not record my findings, So i just forget most of it.
Ps, you can mess with Nvidia inspector settings for the monitor to get a better picture to
compensate for no PP in game.
