I remember many years ago Lewis was up for the GPDA (Grand Prix Drivers Association) Presidency. He had no interest and i don't think he even went to the meetings. He was like i don't care about it.
Now he has his own thing with Black Lives Matter (that is pulling up some illegal stuff like graffiti and vandalism) And he wants all the drivers to join in. Because it is on his terms. I am not saying Lewis is bad but the movement he represents is.
I think your lumping a lot of separate issues into one and jumping to a conclusion based on an enemy that doesn't exist. Black lives matter isn't one harmonious group with a hierarchy. There's the black lives matter movement, which doesn't really have leadership, it's more of an "I'm Spartacus" movement, where individuals are showing solidarity with people who suffer racism, understanding that it still exists and happens. Then there's a black lives matter NGO/charity, They are their own thing with their own agendas, they aren't the official leaders of the BLM "movement", I wouldn't really support them because they don't show their accounts, too much of it happens behind closed doors for my liking. Then you have protesters, and then you have antagonists as a subset of them. They are just using the chaos as a cover to cause havoc. They range from protesters that go too far, to political extremists, to organised crime. But it's inaccurate to lump them all in together and highlight the worst of them as the spokespeople for everyone.
I would argue the opposite Hes torn up tires when others have not. His tire exploded in the 70th anniversary GP (Silverstone 2) Max Verstappen did not.
The red bull was better on it's tyres, that's what the red bull is famous for. The Mercedes is hard on their tyres, but it gives them a tyre advantage. I don't think it's a bit of a guess to say Hamilton wasn't managing his tyres be
better, given that he's were more likely to fail. Verstappen pitted, Hamilton didn't.
Its been spoken about my whole life almost 25 years. Dose anything change' no. It is human nature to fight and argue and make wars and conflict. I just live with it. Martin Luther King has failed so how is Hamilton going to make it any different. Get back to me in 10 years and tell me how the problem is fixed. If it is.
It's not really unique to humans for their to be fighting, it's how all living things on this planet sort stuff out. What makes humans unique is that we don't fight as often. Two random humans that never met before meet and it doesn't descend into fighting. Can't say the same thing about dogs, birds, insects, etc. Human progress has been due to our ability to cooperate, every time we figure out our to cooperate on larger scales, from tribe, to village, to city, to state, things get better, we learn more, we gain more wealth and security. Martin Luther didn't fail, he made progress, to say he failed because he didn't eradicate racism within he's lifetime is just ridiculous.