A picture says a thousand words correct
I would say even with all its so called flaws rf2 is a more complete sim at this point in time.
So comparing the 2 is not really fair and can always leave to issues but its still good to see a side by side comparison.
lets not forget both are still in development. but from the footage shown you can see a difference in the 2 sims. And as pointed out by others we are looking a 2 different cars.
The problems with vid is that we have no clue how the suspension has been set up
and we all know how easy it is to manipulate vids.(not that im saying this has been done.)
If you asked me to test something, this is what id be doing not just driving round a track to see how fast i can lap.
i drive all over the track over every bump looking for such strange reactions, so for me the vid gets a big thumbs up. and this is what i would be looking for.
And looking at the rf2 footage on first looks i would say rf2 does a better job, going over that kurb, but that car should soak up the bumps better.
But i would also hope to see the BMW doing the same good job. at some point in its development
We all know AC has lots of work to be done on it in many different aspects, its far from perfect and far from finished.
Give it a year and we should see some big improvements.
We only have to look were rf2 was this time last year and were it is now, its like a different sim.
Well at least you did not use Mario kart to compare AC with