That's not a signature feature of this site, every site out there has it.Don't forget about the complaining users
That's not a signature feature of this site, every site out there has it.Don't forget about the complaining users
Probably depends how people define 'with ease'. If you win with ease, the opponents werent on top of their game and therefore there is no challenge. That would be boring indeed.One in six of the votes has gone to "win with ease" - that's far more than I expected.
On the rare occasions when I've won with ease, I simply haven't enjoyed it.
One in six of the votes has gone to "win with ease" - that's far more than I expected.
On the rare occasions when I've won with ease, I simply haven't enjoyed it.
This is true, but I've also heard drivers talk about "their race" and "who they're racing against." There have been races where one of the McLaren drivers had a combination of qualifying really well and an opponent (usually Albon) not qualifying as well as he should. So they end up a bit out of place at the start. They usually concede a place after a few laps if they know that they can't sustain the pace on their tires.This is truly a simracer poll. No offense.
When I watch real race driver interviews they all seem to want to be at P1 after Qualifying, defend P1 at T1 and then control the race to the chequered flag.
Because winning gets you paid by the best teams. Not sure they care much for good fights mid pack when all they do is loose time to the front which is hard to make up again.
Ride 4 is really the first very challenging motorcycle game, in MGP20 I win by 15 seconds on 120 AI, while here its harder to win even on 100 AII guarantee the poll result will be to fight for last, but in reality that's not the case. Ride 4 is an uncompromising game and there is no way to bypass the challenges. You're either going to win, win eventually or complain.
The Ride 4 threads are overflowing with complaints it's too difficult. It isn't by the way. Happily there is enough people who embraced the game for what it is.
Ok, you're talking about F1 drivers. Yeah, you might be right. They seem to be the most self-centric lot.This is true, but I've also heard drivers talk about "their race" and "who they're racing against." There have been races where one of the McLaren drivers had a combination of qualifying really well and an opponent (usually Albon) not qualifying as well as he should. So they end up a bit out of place at the start. They usually concede a place after a few laps if they know that they can't sustain the pace on their tires.
I try to understand my limits. I know that in most online races I'm not going to be battling for a podium. I can remember one where I actually was near the leader for the first few laps, but I deliberately slowed myself down because I knew that even if I pushed my absolute hardest I probably wouldn't catch him and I'd more than likely spin and end up finishing way down in the order. I finished 2nd in that race and was very happy with that.
Perhaps that makes me a loser (first of the losers, right?). But I think that if more online racers understood their own abilities and tried to race according to them (while working to improve outside of the formal events), we'd all have better experiences. I suppose I learned this from running in road races. I know my pace for a 5k and it's foolish to try to keep up with the guys who show up wearing their university track uniforms.
That's exactly what Toto Wolf thinks when ask FIA to ban Ferrari PU...As long as I have exciting fights it doesn’t matter to me at which position I’m racing.