Yes, forward and reverse
I don't recall seeing TC % on the Mustang... but I haven't checked on the other cars yetHmmm so did DTM have TC back then?
yep , but for me getting around a loosly worded rule is part of the game , but i believe they did more than twist a few words ...
Their solution was to replace the cross-plane crankshaft with a flat-plane crankshaft, allowing the engine to rev much higher. Trouble was that the rules did not permit this, so Audi initially convinced the governing body that they had created the flat-plane crank by twisting the stock component.
thats a big fib
Andi
I tend to agree with that. Didn't it still have the part number for the legal crankshaft on it, adding an extra layer of deception? I'm all for finding/exploiting loopholes in the rules, that's where you sometimes see the true cleverness of engineers. But in this case it was blatant deception and the attempts to cover their tracks by using old part numbers is a bit across the line of fair play.
That being said, I'm still gonna drive the s**t out of this car in the game from time to time.
This might even make your eye-candy experience a little better...maybe not hiperrealistic graphics, but the lighting (take an eye on this Kunos), the highly detailed track and surroundings...
Well, sorry for this little off topic but I have to tell to someone I've just ended a race driving the Mercedes on Bathurst and I can say its been one of the best experiences on my short simracing life; incredible inmersion!!, maybe not hiperrealistic graphics, but the lighting (take an eye on this Kunos), the highly detailed track and surroundings, the marvelous sound and the fantastic FFB put a smile on my face for 15 minutes; started 5 and finished 8, but who cares?
If you think this is nice, wait till we get nissan r90ck and audi r18 2011