NahOnly thing I could suggest right now to hopefully improve the situation is reducing cof by 1000 (or maybe more) for all teams.
I don't think it's much of a problem, there were quite a lot of technical retirements in the 2004 season per race.I apologize for the once again high amount of dnfs, I'm at a loss as to why it happens. Track magic data was set to 4, and the quick race I did before to test the settings only had 4. But 8 + KER + all the unscheduled stops, I'm clueless.
Only thing I could suggest right now to hopefully improve the situation is reducing cof by 1000 (or maybe more) for all teams. If there are no objections to this, I'm gonna apply that for the next race.
Huh, indeed. My memory let me down it seems, had thought it were way less. Still it was way too much this time imo. If it had been 8 in total, fine, but it were at least 12.I don't think it's much of a problem, there were quite a lot of technical retirements in the 2004 season per race.
We are as perplexed as anyone. Everyone knows Renault's strong qualifying pace but the speed they had in race today was not expected at all. It's too early to say if it was down to the tyres or something else, we have to analyze the data and try to find answers before the Spanish GP.@TTupsi: Not quite the pace today to challenge the Renault, was it related to the Bridgestone tyres or something else?
2004 San Marino GP
FIA Press Conference
@Benutzername: 4th win already here, what is it about this track that makes you this quick?