Alright guys, lets not start picking on one's choices too much here please. It's starting to get a bit off topic.
Ok now i´m going to apply the same logics as you and say that you are "honestly" a redneck living in a trailor.You're just a princess, honestly...
I never said the CTS-V was crap. I said the interior is crap, which it is. I don´t want luxury, i want an interior that feels like it will last for a 100 years. And not pick up knobs after 2 years. If you want to look at luxury then a 7-series might be more fitting.American performance cars in general are more raw, less sophisticated, that I agree, but it doesn't make them crap, you just want too much luxury.
Evolution. The car evolves everytime a new model comes out and the benchmark is still the benchmark since BMW/Mercedes more or less invented the class.But why do you have such an awesome M5 today compared to before ?
Not true. If you are going to discuss then keep things out of lala-land.The CTS-V pushed BMW to develop a saloon when it crushed the Nordschleife with it's simplicity, so they made a car around that track, tuned for that track only to beat the CTS-V, and they barely did in fact.
The 458 ? It was an answer to the ZR1, and it failed miserably as it gets beaten still by the Z06 (with the Z07 package of course)
Beaten in what? 0-402m? 0-60? Track times? Ring time?
P.S. By the way, Kia's chief designer is an ex-Audi designer, just so you know... (It looks crap anyway though)
That's a sleeper for sure, until you use that right foot of yours !
I like Dacia as a city car (current car is a Dacia Logan)
oh well, kids will have to walk to school thenThere are many cheap Volvo 850 T5 and T5-R in Norway nowdays... The engines seem to be an issue when the car has some mileage...