Points in red were dropped from your total because they were lower than your highest score for the week. Your best 25% of finishes are averaged together, so you can have three awful races without affecting the score of your best race.
Don't look at the statistics. Number of incidents, starting position, and laps led are irrelevant for points.
The only thing that matters is where you finish the race, and what the Strength of Field is.
The race you won had a SoF of 1232. That's still slightly below average strength (which is 1350, same as starting iRating). That was high for you, but the Asia division leader has an iRating of 2300 (1000 higher than yours) and the race he finished second in had an SoF of 2551. When you double the Strength of Field, you double the number of points for winning the race, which explains how he earned 139 for second and you earned 75 for a win.
http://members.iracing.com/membersite/member/EventResult.do?&subsessionid=10776057&custid=107331
If you question the points difference, notice that his fastest lap was 2s faster than yours, and his average lap was 2.5s faster than yours.
If you had run the same speed in the same race he was in, you would have finished 9th place instead of winning, and earned around 40 points. SoF actually does a pretty good job of balancing out the points on average. Keep pushing, and as your iRating improves to match your pace you'll find you score pretty accurately against people of the same speed.
It's only complex if you think too hard about it
Literally the only things that matter are finishing position and your iRating compared to the Strength of Field. Once you stop trying to account for incidents or passes, you realize it's incredibly simple to understand the fundamentals (which is the important bit).