Mod Review Score is not calculated correctly.

Umm, not sure why it shouldn't...?
The ratings on your website are 100% broken.

5 star vs 5 star.. Except one has got about 1K downloads more.

Sorted by Rating.

This in terms of fairness is not nice. Definitely not according to statements which have been told in this thread.

Screenshot_2022-12-09-06-18-13-79_4d38fce200f96aeac5e860e739312e76.jpg
 
Last edited:
The ratings on your website are 100% broken.

5 star vs 5 star.. Except one has got about 1K downloads more.

Sorted by Rating.

This in terms of fairness is not nice. Definitely not according to statements which have been told in this thread.

View attachment 622323
OK, my reply to your previous post (over a week ago) was made at a time when your mod was showing with "4.5" graphical stars (and an exact rating on the hover tip of 4.94 stars). This made it entirely unsurprising for it to be where it was in the list, given that we couldn't see the exact rating of the "4.5" star mod above it.
Your latest picture shows one 5.00 (real) star mod above another (yours). Since at present they both have exactly the same number of ratings (18 apiece, not visible in your picture), this doesn't appear to conflict with anything I've said. Please clarify why you think it does. (NB: the download count is not used in the weighted average, just the rating count.)
 

Latest News

To join the OverTake Racing Club races I want them to be: (multiple choice)

  • Free to access

    Votes: 94 91.3%
  • Better structured events

    Votes: 16 15.5%
  • Better structured racing club forum

    Votes: 16 15.5%
  • More use of default game content

    Votes: 12 11.7%
  • More use of fixed setups

    Votes: 28 27.2%
  • No 3rd party registration pages

    Votes: 35 34.0%
  • Less casual events

    Votes: 9 8.7%
  • More casual events

    Votes: 34 33.0%
  • Other, specify in thread

    Votes: 5 4.9%
Back
Top