RD Design Race Season 2005

[mystaaRS]

OK, good to know for later
--
hmm look who is always biased.. forgot premiums can see ratings?

Do I didn't

And what he said was right

 

[Omer Said]

Heidfeld
Briscoe
Kobayashi

 

[Steven Poirier]

RESULT ROUND 2
​

Heifeld 3 --- Utzer 5
Hamilton 2 --- Briscoe 6
Ravel 2 --- Kobayashi 6

So here the standing from now
1-
2-
3-
4-
5- Nick Heidfeld ( Laad )
6- Lewis Hamilton ( Laad )
7- Hans Ravel ( Said )
8- Eddie Ravel ( Said )
9- Nick Heidfeld ( Utzer )
10- Jensen Button ( Black )
11- Rami Saidy ( Saidy )
12- Nick Heidfeld ( Saidy )

 

[Steven Poirier]

GROUP A
Jacques Villeneuve

vs
Ben Utzer

GROUP B
Ryan Briscoe

vs
Kamui Kobayashi

 

[mystaaRS]

Jacques Villeneuve
Kamui Kobayashi

 

[Jimlaad43]

Utzer Briscoe

 

[Benutzername]

Utzer (the name made the difference )
Briscoe

 

[realitychecked]

Utzer
Briscoe

 

[Benutzername]

By the way...

I would like to see a change in the voting system next time. Tell me what you think about it


-

I think the result COULD get a bit... Changed due to the group system. For example: Two not so good cars against each other -> better in the ranking than a good car. (if you can say it that way )

How about just present one car (tbh... basically its always 2 same cars, no need to switch the number?) And then everyone posts a list how he likes the cars most...

Best car: Car C
2. D
3. E
4. A
5. B

Everyone does that and we have a point system.

 

[Deleted member 161052]

Villeneuve
Kobayashi

 

[mystaaRS]

By the way...

I would like to see a change in the voting system next time. Tell me what you think about it


-

I think the result COULD get a bit... Changed due to the group system. For example: Two not so good cars against each other -> better in the ranking than a good car. (if you can say it that way )

How about just present one car (tbh... basically its always 2 same cars, no need to switch the number?) And then everyone posts a list how he likes the cars most...

Best car: Car C
2. D
3. E
4. A
5. B

Everyone does that and we have a point system.

Well, @Steven Poirier we could have a voting system, where the top 5 are in Pool A and the bottom 5 for example are in Pool B. Then one from Pool A faces one from Pool B etc.

 

[Milos]

utzer kobayashi

 

[Omer Said]

By the way...

I would like to see a change in the voting system next time. Tell me what you think about it


-

I agree that we should use just one of the car in voting, using two cars is unnecessary.

Utzer
Briscoe

 

[Milos]

By the way...

I would like to see a change in the voting system next time. Tell me what you think about it


-

I think the result COULD get a bit... Changed due to the group system. For example: Two not so good cars against each other -> better in the ranking than a good car. (if you can say it that way )

How about just present one car (tbh... basically its always 2 same cars, no need to switch the number?) And then everyone posts a list how he likes the cars most...

Best car: Car C
2. D
3. E
4. A
5. B

Everyone does that and we have a point system.

But there should be some luck involved too

 

[Benutzername]

But there should be some luck involved too

Na, in a game where the target is to produce the nicest livery/car of everyone i think it should mostly be about the "product" and not about luck.

 

[mystaaRS]

Na, in a game where the target is to produce the nicest livery/car of everyone i think it should mostly be about the "product" and not about luck.

Yes, but can someone actually look at my idea?

 

[Benutzername]

Yes, but can someone actually look at my idea?

I've got to say.... I dont like it personally

 

[Milos]

Yes, but can someone actually look at my idea?

what idea?

 

[mystaaRS]

what idea?

Are you serious?

Well, @Steven Poirier we could have a voting system, where the top 5 are in Pool A and the bottom 5 for example are in Pool B. Then one from Pool A faces one from Pool B etc.

 

[Milos]

Are you serious?

yes I am serious. And now that I see it I don't like it either.