Thank you sir really apreciated the help. Aldo i really dont know if my monitor is freesync or gsync but i will try to find out
It's freesync so a AMD gpu will be the safe bet.
For 1 monitor and 1920x1080 resolution, a Vega 56 would be a good match for high fps.
In July though the new generation is expected to hit the market so if you can wait, wait.
Cheaper possibility would be the amd rx 590, though a clear step weaker than the Vega 56 but only slightly cheaper...
Freesync means that the fps of the pc and the Hz of the monitor will be synced.
Low input lag, smooth game play, no tearing and the best : not fiddling with settings for hours!
You simply check the fps you can achieve with low graphics settings (cpu limit testing) and then raise the graphics settings until you're happy.
Limit the fps (amd driver software has an inbuilt limiter) at a value you can steadily achieve and be done.
Or simply go with default settings (or maximum settings and go from there.)
With freesync, anything between 55-144 fps/Hz will be enjoyable and small fps drops won't be noticeable.
You still need more or less stable fps though. A drop from 140 fps to 70 will still stutter.
For me, without freesync or gsync, every little fps drop lead to a stuttering. I always used normal vsync, as all other options were stuttering a little too.
I even tried all options with a 165 hz monitor, couldn't get happy no matter what (had it for testing).
Bought my gsync monitor, best decision in my gaming life!
Lot of people will tell you that you wouldn't need freesync or gsync though.
Either they never experienced it properly or they are not sensitive for stuttering.
Problem with my suggestions: a build on mindfactory (German store) results in 990€
It would be future proof though, apart from the rx 590 graphics card.
Building a pc from scratch without a case, psu, cpu cooler etc is expensive.
But buying something better later on, apart from the graphics card, always is a major pain.
New cpu leads mostly to new motherboard. More ram might need selling the existing 8gb and buying a new 16gb set for compatibility.
Then, how much can be saved with a cheap psu, case and cpu cooler compared to the hassle you'll have to replace them... Not worth it.
So I won't advice for anything lower than what I recommend. Going cheaper will result in not as satisfying gaming and also in earlier upgrading.
All my friends regret that they went for the i5 in 2012-2014.
They all upgraded due to big fps drops in quite some games.
My 2012 I7 2600k is still enough for 60 fps in all games.
It's difficult to predict the future though! Investing for the perfect sweetspot now or go cheap first and then cheap but newer again or upgrade to better parts but lose money due to it?
Your choice.
I'd go with a ryzen 3600 (maybe x), 3200 MHz 16gb ddr4, new gen amd gpu for about 300€.
Or if you don't wanna wait until end of July /August:
I5 9600k, same ddr4, Vega 56.
Anyway...
Without gsync I always had short stutters due to my cpu not being able to be perfectly consistent.
With gsync I simply see the fps going down a tiny amount but there's no stutter
Taking the i7 over the i5 was only 60€ back then though.
Nowadays, taking the 9700k over the 9600k is a lot more!
I upgraded my graphics card 3 times though since then!