Instead of being so smug why don't you just tell me since you feel I am ignorant.This statement alone proves the issue with your car....you. If you don't know the function of DCAMBER you can't claim Kunos is using fake values to provide real behavior, because you don't know what those values represent.
I am telling you that even the camber values Kunos use fo the C7 are outside the envelope or real world values used to achieve the behavior they have achieved.
This is totally outside of the mechanism used to adjust camber on a real chassis - in fact in real life the tire DOES stay the same - you are in fact adjusting camber of the CHASSSIS to work with the tire not the other way round.Stereo was saying that instead of changing the car's actual camber measurement (i.e. leave the suspension completely unchanged from the measurements you took), that you can change the tires' optimal camber to provide the "correct" feel even with unchanged suspension. Since every tire is different and has different characteristics, this isn't an unrealistic change to make. To adjust the Camber/Grip relationship, you adjust DCAMBER 0 and 1. This formula can allow you to visualize changes (it will give you a graph of the curve...IIRC y axis is a grip multiplier, x axis is camber in radians): 1+(x*DCAMBER_0+(x^2)*DCAMBER_1)
Not when you install actual C7 wheels and tires on the car - so again, having to change each tire to simulate chassis changes proves my point actually.So evidently it is... (because if the size is different that means the construction is different and therefore every characteristic of the tire, regardless of compound, will be different in some way)
In AC how are the a-arm pickup points located on the chassis? Are they relative to the axle center which is relative to the CofG?And yes suspension points are based on the wheel center.