Uhm - again you are talking about the AS BUILT car - of course it "feels" like the real thing - I long ago stated that very thing.Look...you're wrong. To date, IER has done 6 cars with even more extensive data than what you have access to (regardless of the fact that you physically have the car). One of these cars was tested by a driver that professionally races it in real life (which in and of itself implies a much more in-depth understanding of "feel" than someone that doesn't race) and effectively said that the only difference to real life is that he wasn't sitting in the actual car driving around the actual track (and the brake pedal he was using allowed for more brake pressure than the real thing - so easier to lock the brakes). We're not questioning the accuracy of Kunos' cars...they may not have had enough data and improvised to make the car accurate based on their knowledge. We're arguing for the accuracy of the underlying physics engine, which is undeniably sound.
But if you are telling me that I cannot pull a tire file out and use it as is without tweaks - even where the tire would be EXACTLY the same - I am talking about the digital equivalent of swapping wheels and tires between real cars - then you are actually agreeing with me when I say the engine is using massaged data to get that "real feeling".
Oh and I have read all your posts from 2014/2015 over on the official AC site - you only have this arrogant response each time because you where TOLD all these details early on - well until KS shut the entire place down that is.
As for "access to data" it is not just my car, but rather a pool of about 25 cars that data has been gathered from and averaged out - and with 1000's of laps of track time under my own belt in various cars in real life (many with 600rwhp+ on tap) I am very comfortable with my judgment as to "feel vs real" thank you very much.