When a driver makes a rash manoeuvre, we usually see a grid penalty, regardless of the harshness of that particular manoeuvre.
Growing up, it used to be when drivers sped in the pit lane, they would be hit with a stop-go penalty, something I wish they used more often, because today, I have seen some incidents worthy of a stop-go.
Could it be that racing is less harsh compared to 10-15 years ago? Man, I still watch F1, but I have a feeling among other cons, that the stewards don't even punish drivers responsible for incidents accordingly.
The general idea is:
Drive-through penalty for the most minor infringements
Stop-go penalty for moderate to significant infringements
Disqualification, grid penalties, and race bans for severe to the highest extreme infringements.
Your thoughts?
Growing up, it used to be when drivers sped in the pit lane, they would be hit with a stop-go penalty, something I wish they used more often, because today, I have seen some incidents worthy of a stop-go.
Could it be that racing is less harsh compared to 10-15 years ago? Man, I still watch F1, but I have a feeling among other cons, that the stewards don't even punish drivers responsible for incidents accordingly.
The general idea is:
Drive-through penalty for the most minor infringements
Stop-go penalty for moderate to significant infringements
Disqualification, grid penalties, and race bans for severe to the highest extreme infringements.
Your thoughts?