Took me a while to find this forum. Was wondering why it's tucked away amongst "old" sims when it's very much a "future" sim?
I would love to agree with you David but if I do, I get set upon.
I got a Laugh out of it I wonder if I am suppose to be Al Capone or something? Since it may very well be me when he is describing as pCARS Mafia. I saw it as an attempt at humor which I think he tries to showcase in his video. You either like it or not.
Yep, I just did the same test myself, and unfortunately have to agree with pcars having wonky physics and FFB, though part of the problem is there's so much pendulum effect, that it's no wonder the cars don't feel right and the FFB struggles to maintain fulltime contact.
AC is in another league.
One does not have to be knowledgeable in simphysics to know whether or not you like the way it is working currently. I don't and while I hope I'm wrong, I don't think SMS neither have what takes to make it feel great (to me) nor are aiming to do so. But as i said i do hope that I'm wrong cos I would not mind having another good Sim to play.
I don't think SMS is able to make pCars a sim I will enjoy because they claimed that Shift 2 was a sim with bleeding edge physics, and I found that game to be utter ****.
I don't think SMS are aiming to make pCars a sim that I will enjoy, because the big numbers in terms of players and money simply aren't to be found in that kind of game, it's found in making a great racing game that appeals to the biggest crowd possible, people who will not accept having to spend 50+ laps on a track just to be competitive.
The incessant complainers on here and VR etc. have no intention of influencing the development. It's 42% gloating with 1337'ness, 38% casual bashing, 19% "me too" and 1% sensible but misplaced critique...trying to influence game development publicly when you have direct access to developers makes no sense to me - it's like implementing a Rube Goldberg form of control into a race car.
Still don't quite get it do you!! You CAN criticise pCARS, you CAN agree with David, just use some tact and construct your arguments like David. That way you'll stop coming across as an utter troll<-my opinion.
That is one of the reasons why they have chosen to fund and direct Pcars development as they are.
But can you at least acknowledge that ffb will be worked on more once the tyre physics are more finalised??.
Another reason could be an attempt to get some/many sim racers onside and also have them advertise the game for free.
One of the forumers from Nogrip{think it was Gears} suggested that pcars have GTR2 physics and epic GFX and was ridiculed by the bulk of the WMD members.....so, yeah, that's probably why many of us don't bother....bearing in mind that GTR2 physics are hardly the pinnacle.