2023 Formula One British Grand Prix

Silverstone Grand Prix.jpeg

Who are you supporting at Silverstone this weekend?

  • Max Verstappen

    Votes: 73 29.7%
  • Sergio Perez

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • Charles Leclerc

    Votes: 12 4.9%
  • Carlos Sainz

    Votes: 6 2.4%
  • Lewis Hamilton

    Votes: 30 12.2%
  • George Russell

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • Lando Norris

    Votes: 42 17.1%
  • Oscar Piastri

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • Fernando Alonso

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Lance Stroll

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Valtteri Bottas

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Guanyu Zhou

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • Nyck De Vries

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Yuki Tsunoda

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • Alex Albon

    Votes: 11 4.5%
  • Logan Sargeant

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • Kevin Magnussen

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Nico Hukenberg

    Votes: 2 0.8%
  • Pierre Gasly

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Esteban Ocon

    Votes: 1 0.4%

  • Total voters
    246
One week on from the Austrian Sprint, a more relaxed British Grand Prix awaits the Formula One paddock for Round 10 of the 2023 season. Here are all the stories heading into the weekend.

Image credit: Sidhu & Simon Communications on Newspress

Last week, the Formula One paddock was galivanting through the Austrian Alps. This week, they have a 450,000-person-strong attendance to deal with at Silverstone for the British Grand Prix. This is a race that always delivers action and competitiveness so expect excitement throughout the weekend.

Max Verstappen will certainly want to keep up his winning streak. But with several teams bringing further upgrades to this race, can Red Bull retain their advantage? Here's all you need to know about the weekend.

A circuit adored by all​

The British Grand Prix has almost always taken place at the infamous Silverstone circuit. This ex-Air Force base was converted into a race track in the 1950s and has been a staple of the F1 calendar ever since.

F1 Master Map 2023.jpg


Whilst being a relatively flat venue compared to the likes of Spa, Laguna Seca and the Nordschleife, it certainly lacks none of the thrills. In fact, drivers often praise this fast circuit's challenge and excitement. But that doesn't mean it's a track only good for qualifying and time trials. In fact, it often produces some of the best races each year.

Fans love the British Grand Prix for exactly that. One can always expect great action as cars can run alongside one another and battle tooth and nail. But it's also thanks to an intense party atmosphere that descends on the circuit that is so infectious that it translates through a TV screen better than any other venue. This year will be no different with a 450,000-strong attendance predicted across the three days of on-track running.

More car upgrades​

Once again as we approach a new racing weekend, fans of certain teams will be pleased to learn that upgrades are coming to the cars this weekend. Mercedes and McLaren in particular have brought refreshed front wing designs in order to continue their respective fight backs to the front.

However, the big changes come aboard the Alpha Tauri, a team which has languished at the back of the pack all season. Hoping to fight their way back to the points, they are bringing several new parts to Silverstone. The list includes an all-new floor design along with a fresh diffuser. On a more visible note, the engine cover and rear wing are both significantly different. Finally, they are bringing a tweaked rear suspension design which will hopefully provide the drivers with more stability and confidence.

SI202307070317.jpg


The other Alfa - Romeo - also did a lot of shopping over the past week. They too have had a put a lot of focus into their floor and diffuser design. This is another team that has spent much of the season uncharacteristically anonymous and will be hoping for more this weekend.

Finally, Haas, Red Bull, Aston Martin and Williams are all bringing minute changes to their cars in a more gradual upgrade curve.

Whilst these upgrades will certainly not flip the running order on its head, certain cars may appear closer to the front than previous races. This all helps in creating what one can only hope will be a fantastic 2023 British Grand Prix.

How to watch the 2023 British Grand Prix​

With that in mind, you won't want to miss any of the action. F1 TV will provide coverage for every on-track session. However, for those that can't spend the money on race cars going round in circles, the event will be live and free on Channel 4 in the UK as is the case every year. Furthermore, highlights packages of every session is posted to Youtube relatively quickly. Here are the sessions and times you won't want to miss.

Friday:​

Free Practice 1: 13:30 - 14:30 CET
Free Practice 2: 17:00 - 18:00 CET

Saturday:​

Free Practice 3: 12:30 - 13:30 CET
Qualifying: 16:00 - 17:00 CET

Sunday:​

British Grand Prix: 16:00 - 18:00

Are you excited for this year's Formula One British Grand Prix?
  • Love
Reactions: Kimirai
About author
Angus Martin
Motorsport gets my blood pumping more than anything else. Be it physical or virtual, I'm down to bang doors.

Comments

I understand what you are saying, but wasn't it Verstappen who split the Mercedes for seasons in Qualifying. Mercedes by far the best car in all seasons. With party mode! If we talk about greatness! What you say about Schumacher certainly applies to Verstappen. Max destroy and demoted all teammates the man has already proven himself a long, long time ago!!!

Try to read it again, to me he is an all time great, we are very privileged to have at least 3 all time greats right now on the grid. All I'm saying is that dominating cars distort how the people perceive the drivers.

I have felt that Verstappen was perfectly capable to mount a title challenge since 2017, I was shunned for saying it because everybody and their dog believed the crashtappen narrative. It was obvious that Renault had a engine so severely underpowered that the only way to overtake cars with a lot more acceleration and top speed was only by dive bombing, that inevitably leads to contacts.

How else you are going to overtake a car 10 to 19km/h faster that also accelerates way faster out of the corners?, he was getting behind the slipstream with DRS and sometimes the car ahead was pulling away despite that.

He himself said back then that once he had a championship capable car he would drive with a different more calm approach, he told that with a competitive car you don't need to take big risks anymore an that consistency was going to be key.

Nodoby believed him, they took it as him low key slandering Hamilton, but from 2021 onwards he proved that he was right all along. And nowadays people still keep believing that crashtappen narrative and acting as if he wasn't ready back then.

You don't win record amounts of karting championships with iron fist by being a crash prone driver, those championships are all about consistently performing at top level and consistently finishing races in were in a qualifying session you have 40 cars qualify in the same second as the poleman.

But that said doesn't mean that he is an unbeatable racing god like some people are starting to overhype him due to the OP car and weak team mate, no driver ever has been as good as people are sayin he is now nor how the british press was telling us that Lewis was.

I also don't even believe the stupid narrative of the 20 best drivers in the world in F1, I'm convinced that Van Gisbergen, Palou and many others are capable to win F1 races with equal machinery than the rest of drivers.

I'm sure that on equal machinery the top drivers still would still be top drivers, but drivers that now are seen as grid fodder could win some races here and there and being very uncomfortably closer to the top drivers than most fans believe, and the inverse, some top drivers could be exposed as Vettel was twice.

Car performance distort how the fans perceive the drivers quality, Verstappen didn't learn how to drive suddenly in 2021 nor Lewis suddenly stopped being crash prone to become a rock solid winning powerhouse in 2014. Now people act as if Leclerc right now is a moron, a qualifiying one trick pony. But at the start of 2022 when he had the fastest car he seemed unbeatable and rock solid.

Russel seemed godly at Williams, now feels pedestrian at Mercedes, Gasly seemed trash against Verstappen, then Godly in Alpha Tauri, and now grid fodder at Alpine.
Any of those drivers had the same skill at any team, is the car performance and how weak or strong their team mate is that shapes how they are perceived by most of the fans.
 
Try to read it again, to me he is an all time great, we are very privileged to have at least 3 all time greats right now on the grid. All I'm saying is that dominating cars distort how the people perceive the drivers.

I have felt that Verstappen was perfectly capable to mount a title challenge since 2017, I was shunned for saying it because everybody and their dog believed the crashtappen narrative. It was obvious that Renault had a engine so severely underpowered that the only way to overtake cars with a lot more acceleration and top speed was only by dive bombing, that inevitably leads to contacts.

How else you are going to overtake a car 10 to 19km/h faster that also accelerates way faster out of the corners?, he was getting behind the slipstream with DRS and sometimes the car ahead was pulling away despite that.

He himself said back then that once he had a championship capable car he would drive with a different more calm approach, he told that with a competitive car you don't need to take big risks anymore an that consistency was going to be key.

Nodoby believed him, they took it as him low key slandering Hamilton, but from 2021 onwards he proved that he was right all along. And nowadays people still keep believing that crashtappen narrative and acting as if he wasn't ready back then.

You don't win record amounts of karting championships with iron fist by being a crash prone driver, those championships are all about consistently performing at top level and consistently finishing races in were in a qualifying session you have 40 cars qualify in the same second as the poleman.

But that said doesn't mean that he is an unbeatable racing god like some people are starting to overhype him due to the OP car and weak team mate, no driver ever has been as good as people are sayin he is now nor how the british press was telling us that Lewis was.

I also don't even believe the stupid narrative of the 20 best drivers in the world in F1, I'm convinced that Van Gisbergen, Palou and many others are capable to win F1 races with equal machinery than the rest of drivers.

I'm sure that on equal machinery the top drivers still would still be top drivers, but drivers that now are seen as grid fodder could win some races here and there and being very uncomfortably closer to the top drivers than most fans believe, and the inverse, some top drivers could be exposed as Vettel was twice.

Car performance distort how the fans perceive the drivers quality, Verstappen didn't learn how to drive suddenly in 2021 nor Lewis suddenly stopped being crash prone to become a rock solid winning powerhouse in 2014. Now people act as if Leclerc right now is a moron, a qualifiying one trick pony. But at the start of 2022 when he had the fastest car he seemed unbeatable and rock solid.

Russel seemed godly at Williams, now feels pedestrian at Mercedes, Gasly seemed trash against Verstappen, then Godly in Alpha Tauri, and now grid fodder at Alpine.
Any of those drivers had the same skill at any team, is the car performance and how weak or strong their team mate is that shapes how they are perceived by most of the fans.
I have also defended Max a lot over the years on RD. Resulting in many heated discussions.
The crash-stappen guys don't come here to discuss anymore :roflmao:
And I know who they are because they were here with every discussion ;)

until he loses again, then they will come again. That's how it goes in every sport, winners come and go. But I soon saw that Max was a great talent. perhaps the biggest after Senna and Jim Clark
 
Last edited:
What a boring F1 season. Without Max it would be quite exciting, but so you can only bet when he has the third world title secure. My money is on Suzuka...

Glück auf!
 
Premium
Try to read it again, to me he is an all time great, we are very privileged to have at least 3 all time greats right now on the grid. All I'm saying is that dominating cars distort how the people perceive the drivers.

I have felt that Verstappen was perfectly capable to mount a title challenge since 2017, I was shunned for saying it because everybody and their dog believed the crashtappen narrative. It was obvious that Renault had a engine so severely underpowered that the only way to overtake cars with a lot more acceleration and top speed was only by dive bombing, that inevitably leads to contacts.

How else you are going to overtake a car 10 to 19km/h faster that also accelerates way faster out of the corners?, he was getting behind the slipstream with DRS and sometimes the car ahead was pulling away despite that.

He himself said back then that once he had a championship capable car he would drive with a different more calm approach, he told that with a competitive car you don't need to take big risks anymore an that consistency was going to be key.

Nodoby believed him, they took it as him low key slandering Hamilton, but from 2021 onwards he proved that he was right all along. And nowadays people still keep believing that crashtappen narrative and acting as if he wasn't ready back then.

You don't win record amounts of karting championships with iron fist by being a crash prone driver, those championships are all about consistently performing at top level and consistently finishing races in were in a qualifying session you have 40 cars qualify in the same second as the poleman.

But that said doesn't mean that he is an unbeatable racing god like some people are starting to overhype him due to the OP car and weak team mate, no driver ever has been as good as people are sayin he is now nor how the british press was telling us that Lewis was.

I also don't even believe the stupid narrative of the 20 best drivers in the world in F1, I'm convinced that Van Gisbergen, Palou and many others are capable to win F1 races with equal machinery than the rest of drivers.

I'm sure that on equal machinery the top drivers still would still be top drivers, but drivers that now are seen as grid fodder could win some races here and there and being very uncomfortably closer to the top drivers than most fans believe, and the inverse, some top drivers could be exposed as Vettel was twice.

Car performance distort how the fans perceive the drivers quality, Verstappen didn't learn how to drive suddenly in 2021 nor Lewis suddenly stopped being crash prone to become a rock solid winning powerhouse in 2014. Now people act as if Leclerc right now is a moron, a qualifiying one trick pony. But at the start of 2022 when he had the fastest car he seemed unbeatable and rock solid.

Russel seemed godly at Williams, now feels pedestrian at Mercedes, Gasly seemed trash against Verstappen, then Godly in Alpha Tauri, and now grid fodder at Alpine.
Any of those drivers had the same skill at any team, is the car performance and how weak or strong their team mate is that shapes how they are perceived by most of the fans.
I think a lot of it boils down to how 'in love' with that car the driver is, Vettle had his sweetheart with the blown defuser and a very tight rear end, when the car was designed with a different philosophy he wasn't as 'in love' the same can be said for every driver on the grid, they're all godly drivers that would put the layman to shame in even a mundane car but they've been taught how to drive competitively since they were 4-5 years old... it's what they do.

Jim Clark was probably the greatest 'natural' talent ever, but there are drivers on the grid that would beat him outright were they on the same grid in the same machine now, the level of training and fitness, (and even the diets) that F1 drivers have undergone is responsible for that.
I remember Michael Schumacher nerfing Senna out in France in 92 , I said right then "he a future Champion" and when he took his first Victory a few races later at Spa... he didn't even break a sweat when he was on the podium, and I (along with the rest of the world) realised that fitness had become one of the most important factors in modern Grand Prix.
As for the greats, that's really about stats and a personal opinion that sways results (I always wanted JPM to do well but he was just too 'old school' Mansellish, but hell, he was entertaining)

For me Verstappen is right up there with the greats on the grid today, he's doing a better job and he's just honest about the way he sees things, as Martin Brundle said "of all the drivers on the grid I'd rather go for a beer with Max because he's honest and tells it how he sees it"
 
I can't believe no-ones talking about the worst thing about the race......that APPALLING anthem. WTF thought that would be a good idea?!!!! Made me want to rip my ear drums out!
 
Jim Clark was probably the greatest 'natural' talent ever, but there are drivers on the grid that would beat him outright were they on the same grid in the same machine now, the level of training and fitness, (and even the diets) that F1 drivers have undergone is responsible for that.
The fact is modern drivers are educated in ways that were impossible even 30 years ago. The training, the sim experience and the feedback from telemetry make modern drivers a completely different kettle of fish to drivers in the past who were in a lot of ways winging it.

Alex Albon is really showing his class this year. He's outdriving that Williams.
 
I can't believe no-ones talking about the worst thing about the race......that APPALLING anthem. WTF thought that would be a good idea?!!!! Made me want to rip my ear drums out!
what national anthem do you mean? There were several
 
The fact is modern drivers are educated in ways that were impossible even 30 years ago. The training, the sim experience and the feedback from telemetry make modern drivers a completely different kettle of fish to drivers in the past who were in a lot of ways winging it.

Alex Albon is really showing his class this year. He's outdriving that Williams.
I partly agree with you, but a strong mindset can never be learned (performance under pressure) I think Norris and Leclerc are just as great talents as Verstappen. Only I wouldn't know how they perform under world championship pressure?? As an example I take Jean Alesi and Jarno Trulli. two great talents that were never where they should be
 
Last edited:
Great race and finally Mclaren has a decent car again. I just hope this translates also to other tracks with different profiles. For me Norris is the second best driver of the grid and thus I am just happy that he has a car where he can show it. Now let's see if they can catch Ferrari and Aston :)

WC is probably settled as long as Max sits in a car that is the best on the grid (or even close to the best). My hopes for an interesting title challenge are low (or rather non-existant) until 2026.
 
The fact is modern drivers are educated in ways that were impossible even 30 years ago. The training, the sim experience and the feedback from telemetry make modern drivers a completely different kettle of fish to drivers in the past who were in a lot of ways winging it.

Alex Albon is really showing his class this year. He's outdriving that Williams.

You are right in a way, but that is a double edge argument. We can also argue that it isn't possible to know if current drivers would be as fast as the drivers of old without the modern training, telemetry and safety of our era. There is no way to compare them in a fair way.

And we can go even further and argue that some drivers of the past maybe could have the kind of natural skill and intuition as to find for themselves how to perform at 2023 top level growing in their own era environment without simulators and modern knowledge.

Fangio even knew about the friction circle theory in the 50's, who knows if 26 years old Clark or Fangio could be as fast as current top F1 drivers in their era cars?. We can argue that their physical training was subpar. But back then they also used enhancing drugs that made them capable to mantain a higher level of concentration for longer, get less fatigue and increase their stamina, those drugs were there available as surplus from what the armies used in WW2. That may or may not could make up for their lack of physical prowess.

We can't compare them with current drivers or throw shade on them based on recency bias, we will never know how a modern driver would fare to them if he had born in their era nor how the drivers of the past would perform if they had born in the current era.

For that reason I believe that they should only be considered all time greats accounting their historical background and comparing them against the rivals they had to face of on their own era instead of comparing performance on face value.

We tend to subconsciously believe that people of the past were dumber, they just had less technology and knowledge. That's the reason why some people still keep believing that the pyramids couldn't be built by the egyptians. People of the past were every bit as smart and capable as modern people, they were genetically almost identical after all.
 
Last edited:
You are right in a way, but that is a double edge argument. We can also argue that it isn't possible to know if current drivers would be as fast as the drivers of old without the modern training, telemetry and safety of our era. There is no way to compare them in a fair way.

And we can go even further and argue that some drivers of the past maybe could have the kind of natural skill and intuition as to find for themselves how to perform at 2023 top level growing in their own era environment without simulators and modern knowledge.

Fangio even knew about the friction circle theory in the 50's, who knows if 26 years old Clark or Fangio could be as fast as current top F1 drivers in their era cars?. We can argue that their physical training was subpar. But back then they also used enhancing drugs that made them capable to mantain a higher level of concentration for longer, get less fatigue and increase their stamina, those drugs were there available as surplus from what the armies used in WW2. That may or may not could make up for their lack of physical prowess.

We can't compare them with current drivers or throw shade on them based on recency bias, we will never know how a modern driver would fare to them if he had born in their era nor how the drivers of the past would perform if they had born in the current era.

For that reason I believe that they should only be considered all time greats accounting their historical background and comparing them against the rivals they had to face of on their own era instead of comparing performance on face value.

We tend to subconsciously believe that people of the past were dumber, they just had less technology and knowledge. That's the reason why some people still keep believing that the pyramids couldn't be built by the egyptians. People of the past were every bit as smart and capable as modern people, they were genetically almost identical after all.
You say a lot of good things Mr. Trasgu!!
And don't forget the danger that was there then, a little bit of bad luck on the car meant you died
 
Why do we have to copy the americans with this national anthem thing before sporting events anyways?... its a sporting event, not a military parade, or a national holiday...
 
You are right in a way, but that is a double edge argument. We can also argue that it isn't possible to know if current drivers would be as fast as the drivers of old without the modern training, telemetry and safety of our era. There is no way to compare them in a fair way.
If they had access to the same tech and training (basically if they were born today) they'd be the same as a modern driver, my point is they didn't have any of that. It allowed one driver to find an advantage that no one else knew about. That's all gone now. There aren't any big leaps left to make the minimum standard has been raised to the point any modern driver sent back in time to compete would probably be unbeatable.
 
Premium
The fact is modern drivers are educated in ways that were impossible even 30 years ago. The training, the sim experience and the feedback from telemetry make modern drivers a completely different kettle of fish to drivers in the past who were in a lot of ways winging it.

Alex Albon is really showing his class this year. He's outdriving that Williams.
Drivers of 'the past' didn't have all the telemetry and data to compare their own driving with others' data. The best drivers of 'the past' were the more naturally gifted and bravest ones. The only way the lesser drivers could learn from them was not by analysing telemetry but by following them, if they were good enough to be close enough to learn. Racing cars nowadays is almost like a different sport.
 
The calls for Perez to go from red bull are a bit weird; he's still dominating in 2nd place of the DC and has won two races.
Narrowly missed out on 2nd last year didn't he.

I don't remember such a witch hunt over botass' seat after getting 5th in the DC 2018 for example :O_o:
 
The calls for Perez to go from red bull are a bit weird; he's still dominating in 2nd place of the DC and has won two races.
Narrowly missed out on 2nd last year didn't he.

I don't remember such a witch hunt over botass' seat after getting 5th in the DC 2018 for example :O_o:
It's mainly Marko and Ricciardo fans doing it!
 
Premium
The calls for Perez to go from red bull are a bit weird; he's still dominating in 2nd place of the DC and has won two races.
Narrowly missed out on 2nd last year didn't he.

I don't remember such a witch hunt over botass' seat after getting 5th in the DC 2018 for example :O_o:
Probably because the many Ham fans were quite happy with Bottas in the other Merc :)
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Angus Martin
Article read time
3 min read
Views
5,924
Comments
61
Last update

How often do you meet up (IRL) with your simracing friends?

  • Weekly

    Votes: 54 9.0%
  • Monthly

    Votes: 29 4.8%
  • Yearly

    Votes: 37 6.2%
  • Weekly at lan events

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Monthly at lan events

    Votes: 2 0.3%
  • Yearly at lan events

    Votes: 14 2.3%
  • Never have

    Votes: 472 78.5%
Back
Top