After trying AC a while ago and not liking it, I decided to give it another chance and returned after a looong brake. I have to admit it has improved a lot, and I somehow enjoy it now. However I have some questions regarding brake balance.
Why is it so much forward in AC? I didn't have much time to drive all the cars yet, but for instance, 2017 Porsche 911 RSR starts at 55%, and even though it seems to be very much front biased for a Porsche, I have trouble not locking the rears.
Moreover I have hard time feeling brakes locking when trailbraking (I have all the canned effects set to 0) and I loose time because I tend to not brake hard enough being afraid to lock the brakes. It's a bit like driving in the dark. If I shift the bias even more forward, like to say 59-60% it gets way better, but 60% brake bias for a 911 RSR doesn't sound right.
BTW, this is not for Bathurst, where you shift the bias a bit more forward. I tested on Zandvoort.
I have much better feeling of the brakes in rF2 when it comes to Porsche. Is Assetto calculating the bias differently?
Why is it so much forward in AC? I didn't have much time to drive all the cars yet, but for instance, 2017 Porsche 911 RSR starts at 55%, and even though it seems to be very much front biased for a Porsche, I have trouble not locking the rears.
Moreover I have hard time feeling brakes locking when trailbraking (I have all the canned effects set to 0) and I loose time because I tend to not brake hard enough being afraid to lock the brakes. It's a bit like driving in the dark. If I shift the bias even more forward, like to say 59-60% it gets way better, but 60% brake bias for a 911 RSR doesn't sound right.
BTW, this is not for Bathurst, where you shift the bias a bit more forward. I tested on Zandvoort.
I have much better feeling of the brakes in rF2 when it comes to Porsche. Is Assetto calculating the bias differently?
