They're two completely different things. I don't think you need a 9th gen CPU to run AC at 118fps. I have a i7 8086 with a 1070 and I can run it at maxed settings in VR with 2x SS.There both scary prices , the 9700 will give me the solid 118 fps i need in AC?
neither will give me a solid 118 in ACC ?
Isn't that true though? I read the 20 series GPUs maybe enter legacy status sooner then any prior GPU family.You don't need a 2080, a 1080ti is also fine
@RasmusP
@Martin Fiala
or any one that can help????
Msi afterburner
Brands hatch GP Gt3 ( not that it matters )
23 Ai
AC
i5 6600k
Using FPS & Ai to load CPU.
Limited to 60fps all cpu cores at about
65% load
Removing FPS cap....
Now 1 Ai.....
FPS at 290
All 4 cores at 90 + % .. sometimes railing at 100%.
My point is, all cores are in unison with one
and another.
From what has been hinted at , I expected
only one core to be loaded, but when one
core railed , all 4 cores railed also.
It’s like I have a 1 core 4 core processor.
It almost makes me think that if I replaced
my i5 with a i9 9600k assuming they a similarly clocked all I would have is extra cache; all 6 cores
will be in unison.
I can see the gain in that , as long as 1 core in the 4 core equals 1 core in the 6 core.
It’s like the processor is using all it’s cores
irrespective of the software requirements ?
Which leads onto more questions
I am obviously missing something, can you
give a corrective explanation .
I think an explanation has priviously been
forwarded to me but unfortunately I sm still
confused.
I do realise that I am looking at a snap shot from
Msi afterburner every few hundred millisecond.
But at this point in time, I cannot see that that matters
Isn't that true though? I read the 20 series GPUs maybe enter legacy status sooner then any prior GPU family.
Yes. My point was that a 1080ti and a 2080 basically have the same performance.Isn't that true though? I read the 20 series GPUs maybe enter legacy status sooner then any prior GPU family.
On holidays from next Monday ongoing. I'm gonna make a comparison with and without hyperthreading and with 3 vs 4 cores (and ht on/off) so you'll be able to see the differences.@RasmusP
@Martin Fiala
or any one that can help????
Msi afterburner
Brands hatch GP Gt3 ( not that it matters )
23 Ai
AC
i5 6600k
Using FPS & Ai to load CPU.
Limited to 60fps all cpu cores at about
65% load
Removing FPS cap....
Now 1 Ai.....
FPS at 290
All 4 cores at 90 + % .. sometimes railing at 100%.
My point is, all cores are in unison with one
and another.
From what has been hinted at , I expected
only one core to be loaded, but when one
core railed , all 4 cores railed also.
It’s like I have a 1 core 4 core processor.
It almost makes me think that if I replaced
my i5 with a i9 9600k assuming they a similarly clocked all I would have is extra cache; all 6 cores
will be in unison.
I can see the gain in that , as long as 1 core in the 4 core equals 1 core in the 6 core.
It’s like the processor is using all it’s cores
irrespective of the software requirements ?
Which leads onto more questions
I am obviously missing something, can you
give a corrective explanation .
I think an explanation has priviously been
forwarded to me but unfortunately I sm still
confused.
I do realise that I am looking at a snap shot from
Msi afterburner every few hundred millisecond.
But at this point in time, I cannot see that that matters
I tried that with AC. Hyperthreading makes no noticeable difference with a 3770K. Performance was something like 25fps with a single core. Even disabling one core had a hit.On holidays from next Monday ongoing. I'm gonna make a comparison with and without hyperthreading and with 3 vs 4 cores (and ht on/off) so you'll be able to see the differences.
My point is, all cores are in unison with one
and another.
From what has been hinted at , I expected
only one core to be loaded, but when one
core railed , all 4 cores railed also.
1 thread can't be split so the theoretical maximum cpu load is either 1 core at 100% or all cores "shuffling" and showing a load of 25%.
I don't see quite the same thing. I note that with acs.exe there are about 44 threads running. With my eight processes (HT switched on) CPU0 is maxed out and CPUs 1-7 are all chugging away at about 20-30%. i7-3770k@4.7ghz.But what do i see, all four cores moving in a reasonable synchronized fashion to the demands of my increased fps. Not 1 core being stretched, and 3 core keeping up with the extra marginal demands that may incur.