I also notice that you didn't list any of the positive comments that I've made in regard to RF2, or any posts trying to work through various bugs with other users.
Because I was making a direct response to your claim that -
I think my actual criticism of S397 has been pretty measured, but gets blown out of proportion because of fan boy reaction.
I thought you wanted a reasoned argument?
So I don't think you'll be winning any awards for honesty any time soon.
But I guess I can understand how a shill may take umbrage any time someone is critical of their favorite sim.
Or maybe just hurling libelous (and clearly false) insults is more your style? I can honestly say, hand on heart, that I have never spoken to or had any correspondence (other than possibly asking one or two questions on an open forum... I don't remember, but it's possible) with any staff member or associate, of any racing sim. So, your accusation of dishonesty doesn't hold any more water than your flawed arguments or your illogical reasoning.
I've already explained my logic, however you appear to be incapable of comprehending some pretty basic reasoning.
Seems a bit rich, coming from someone who is incapable of supporting his theories. Your logic is imaginary, it's logic which doesn't hold water. it's impossible to divert funds which don't exist, but you consistently ignore any reasoned argument which doesn't fit your agenda.
A cash grab is when you have a flawed base product and continue to sell DLC.
Well, you'll accuse me of semantics, but I looked this up. And, just as I thought, the first two definitions I found read - "When movie studios
produce unnecessary and often poor quality sequels in order to
obtain more money." and "A product designed primarily or solely with the intent of generating profits." Say what you like, it is documented fact that, in parallel with new content, including some free content, S397 have been working on new shaders and a new UI. So, your claims of a cash grab seem to be unsubstantiated, incorrect and, if I'm honest scurrilous. If, as you claim, you are "a fan of S397", why would you post these (potentially) damaging lies about them and their product on a public forum?
The fact that you would try to be dishonest with other users and sugarcoat the issues with RF2 actually makes perfect sense in that context.
That's two accusations of dishonesty, could you give example please?
I guess perhaps it's true that I really do everything in my power to undermine the product, like helping my friends and other users to fix their issues with RF2 so they don't just uninstall it in disgust. I also make ridiculous claims without evidence that it's a great driving experience and has great potential. You really nailed me on that one Sherlock.
Well, you got me there. I don't really see your positive side, although I have seen your comments about the driving experience, which I failed to mention - apologies for that. I've made clear concessions that there is plenty of room for improvement in rF2 myself - you wouldn't know it though, from reading your fan boy jibes.
I've already explained my logic, however you appear to be incapable of comprehending some pretty basic reasoning. I'm afraid I really can't help you with that unfortunately. But in case you've missed it for the umpteenth time, I've stated that it's merely my opinion. It's worth about as much as your hot takes on RF2, except unlike yourself and Martin, I don't have quite as much ego to believe that my opinion is fact.
Your opinion of your own grasp of logic is juxtaposed to my opinion of your grasp of logic. It's not that I don't understand what you're trying to say, I just fundamentally disagree. Your assertion that S397 could "fix up the base game" with funds that are redirected from content, doesn't seem to take into account what effect this might have on the future production of content. What effects would it have on users who are eagerly anticipating new content?
But I think it would be best if I just moved on and you return to your echo chamber with the other fan boys where you can present "facts and evidence" to each other on how amazing it is that RF2 has no flaws
You can make unsubstantiated scurrilous claims on a public forum if you so choose, I guess. But equally, I can reply to them and find fault with them.
On a broader topic, just reading through this thread, it seems clear that there are still a few legitimate buggy things left to address with rF2. These will affect enjoyment at different levels, for each individual I guess, so perhaps we should all try to take a balanced view
There are other instances, where I'm open and honest that rF2 is not without flaws. Your final comments just seem spiteful.