Kozko Out, Hood In as Motorsport Games CEO

Hood Kozko Motorsport Games.jpg
Following the reveal of their 2022 Q4 results last month, rFactor 2 developers Motorsport Games have moved on from their previous CEO.

Image credit: Motorsport Games

After a period of some turmoil, Motorsport Games has terminated the employment of their previous CEO Dmitry Kozko, effective as of 19 April 2023. In his place, Stephen Hood will take up the mantel of Motorsport Games CEO, returning to the company after just over a year. Kozko will remain involved with the company as a director.

In a statement provided to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Motorsport Games outlined their reasoning for taking this step.

“The board of directors, while noting Mr. Kozko’s significant efforts and achievements, especially in fund raising, for the Company, concluded that Mr. Hood’s extensive prior knowledge of the Company and its products and extensive experience in game development would be a better fit for the Company in its games’ development stage.”

Hood served as the president of Motorsport Games from April 2019 to January 2022. Beforehand, he worked as a director of 704 Games, the developers behind the NASCAR Heat games, and as a Creative Director and Chief Game Designer for Codemasters.

A Rocky Road​

Late last year, Motorsport Games underwent significant changes to the composition of its upper management. Several members of the board of directors resigned their posts within the company shortly before it was due to reveal its Q3 results.

More recently, MSG’s Q4 results revealed a 54% decrease in revenue compared to the previous year’s fourth quarter, a fall from $8.2 million to $3.8 million. However, a reduction to the financial outlay with regards to sales and marketing, as well as development, meant that the net loss fell from $7 million in Q4 2021 to $4.8 million in Q4 2022.

Despite this reduction to the net loss figures, the company stated that “we do not believe we have sufficient cash on hand to fund our operations for the remainder of 2023, and that additional funding will be required in order to continue operations.”

Editor's Take (Jacob Hancox)​

In my opinion, a shakeup at the top of Motorsport Games makes perfect sense. Given Mr. Kozko’s cited strengths being “especially in fund raising”, combined with the poor state of MSG’s balance sheets, it is evident that the current approach was not conducive to the company’s long-term success.

As such, I also believe it is a sensible step to maintain Mr. Kozko as a director of the company, so that he may “assist the board of directors and the management of the Company with fundraising”.

On a similar note, the decision to bring back Mr. Hood makes a good deal of sense. His background and experience with game development may well lead to better quality products. Given the public reception to Motorsport Games’ NASCAR 21: Ignition, which sits at a shocking 26% approval rating on Steam, it is essential that the company focuses on quality.

Motorsport Games’ own statements regarding its future aren’t promising, and nor is the fact that the development budget was reduced in an effort to balance the books. However, we can at least hope that this is a step in the right direction for the company and therefore for sim racing as a whole.


What are your thoughts on Motorsport Games’ future? Tell us on Twitter at @OverTake_gg or in the comments down below!
About author
Jacob (OverTake)
My name is Jacob and I have been writing for OverTake since November of 2020. I come from the UK, but I'm now living in Berlin. I love to watch, write about and sometimes shout about all forms of racing.

Comments

That's not that simple. You don't know what the shareholders' objectives are, you don't know which assets have been bought or built for years, tou even don't know when the next games qre forecasted. A new CEO comes new objectives, that's all we are able to conclude. Again, analysing companies doesn't work with so little information.
It is really simple. As a public company, all info on planned releases and planned technological advancements are public. That's the law. A lack of information on planned releases, legally, is a lack of planned releases.

We knew AC2 was coming in May, 2021 because Kunos had to tell investors what they were spending money on. That's probably 2.5 years before they'd begin to put efforts into marketing. That's what being public is.
 
Sure it is not so simple but it is also sure that shareholders are not there to burn tens of millions every year.
Also, although we do not have their revenues plan, I don't think the games they have in the pipe are going to be remotely close to generating 20-30M margins per year realistically.
There is a reason if their stock value went from $30 to less than $1 and all of the financial games they made by merging 10 stocks into 1 still did not stop the slump as they lost again half of their value in a couple of months and are down to $5 (equivalent to $0.5 pre-merging).
Time will tell.
That's the issue with speculative public behaviour. It is indeed not a good sign but not an economical reality. That is the main issue with the disconnection between shares value and real economical value. I am not stating the company is in good condition, just that we don't have enough info to make conclusions.
 
That's the issue with speculative public behaviour. It is indeed not a good sign but not an economical reality. That is the main issue with the disconnection between shares value and real economical value. I am not stating the company is in good condition, just that we don't have enough info to make conclusions.
The financial report is made by MSG themselves. Kozko has stated in the quarter financial review call that they have burnt 70M in two years. This is not speculation, it is reality by their own CEO words.
Then it's up to us to believe or not that the Indycar and Nascar games can bring 35M per year of margins plus any additional money that would be needed for further future investments and growth of the company.
It doesn't sound realistic but who knows.
 
It is really simple. As a public company, all info on planned releases and planned technological advancements are public. That's the law. A lack of information on planned releases, legally, is a lack of planned releases.

We knew AC2 was coming in May, 2021 because Kunos had to tell investors what they were spending money on. That's probably 2.5 years before they'd begin to put efforts into marketing. That's what being public is.
Well, you missunderstand the point. It may be simple to get official information. But they are not presented there on Overtake and conclusions are made on information which are not sufficiently relevant to come to any conclusion ; so it is not that simple to make any analysis with this pieces of information.

And as I explained before, and I won't go into the same analysis (about more figures I found about the company), it's really easy to do some make up and show what a CEO want to (you can already see a change in the figure presentation betwwen the last MSG figures and the previous year for example). Although, even without any makeup, it is important to analyse the list of assets the company owns (do you have it?) to understand the health of a company. About the accounts make up, do you remember the Enron scandal with Arthur Adersen? Where do you think Arthur Andersen's former employees are now that they have lost their jobs? In high management jobs (CEO, CFO...) in big companies. So their former bad practices are still there in place (and seriously, the remaining big 4 are not better).

If you know about companies valorization, you understand that a company's value is based about an infinite business, not a 1 year, 2 years, even 5 years planned releases. Which is the difference between long time "business" shareholders and short time generic speculators (which are generally you're bank investing your money without you knowing anything).

Instead of trying to make a point to bash MSG based on unrelevant information, it is the opportunity to learn a bit about that kind of news and not being a sheep. We get irrelevant information there, and some of us are making assumptions based on them. I'm trying to help there, to educate in my humble way (I know how to make up the accounting figures, to work with these incompetent big 4, how to valorize a company, that's just my job ; though I've always refused lying to shareholders by doing some make up with my figures, under the instructions of former Arthur Andersen former employees :D), and if you stick to illusions, I'm sorry for you.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Jacob (OverTake)
Article read time
3 min read
Views
7,709
Comments
44
Last update

What is the reason for your passion for sim racing?

  • Watching real motorsport

    Votes: 486 69.1%
  • Physics and mechanics

    Votes: 298 42.4%
  • Competition and adrenaline

    Votes: 322 45.8%
  • Practice for real racing

    Votes: 150 21.3%
  • Community and simracers

    Votes: 193 27.5%
Back
Top