Le Mans Ultimate Will Now Be Early Access, Evolve Throughout 2024

Le Mans Ultimate Will Now Be Early Access, Evolve Throughout 2024 RD 03.jpg
In a switch, the upcoming official Le Mans and WEC game will still launch on 20th February 2024, but in an Early Access state.

Images: Motorsport Games / Studio 397

Following a delay from December ‘23 to February ‘24, Le Mans Ultimate will now release initially as an Early Access title as work continues at developer Studio 397.

Based upon the basic architecture of existing simulation platform rFactor 2, but with several planned enhancements, it will feature content from the 2023 FIA World Endurance Championship at launch.

This hasn’t changed with the Early Access programme, with the 12 car models used in the series last year represented at launch alongside the seven circuits in their championship layouts – the team is exploring the possibility of additional configurations for a later date.


Today’s new trailer showcases glimpses of the Aston Martin Vantage GTE, Porsche 911 RSR GTE, Cadillac V-Series.R (running on electricity in the pitlane) and the Glickenhaus SCG 007 for the first time. It does not, however, show the HUD.

The Bahrain International Circuit, at night, Fuji Speedway and Sebring’s pitlane can also briefly be spotted. Markedly, several cars are seen racing on track at once, something most prior updates were missing.

All venues are set to include day-to-night cycles, dynamic weather and track surface evolution analogous to Factor 2’s Real Road 2.0 system.

All vehicles are said to have been rebuilt from the ground up, inside and out, for LMU – even if some of the cars are shared with the outfit’s prior titles. Over 100 real-world liveries will be available from launch too, including variations of sponsors or 24 Hours of Le Mans-specific designs.

Le Mans Ultimate Bahrain Peugeot vs Toyota.jpg


The Garage 56 modified Chevrolet NASCAR that competed at the centenary event as a one-off is omitted, however.

Ahead of the release date, we hope to see footage or images of the Corvette GTE, Glickenhaus SCG 007 and Cadillac V-Series.R alongside Sebring and Fuji Speedway. Gameplay footage has previously recently been published for the Toyota GR010 at Portimão and Ferrari 499P at Monza, while today’s footage also sees the Ferrari 488 GTE, Porsche 963 and wingless Peugeot 9X8 on track.

As for 2024-season content, or historical vehicles, there’s the following hint provided by Motorsport Games: “There is certainly a huge amount of current and historic inspiration to draw from!”

Ranked Multiplayer Included At Launch​

During the Early Access phases, Motorsport Games’ RaceControl online ranking system – with driver and safety ratings – will be available.

Claimed to carry across learnings from having the system in rFactor 2, there will be daily races available at intervals across three levels: Beginner, Intermediate and Advanced.

Creating your owner server, however, will be a notable omission initially, with that and the ability to enter special events slated for updates post-release.

Le Mans Ultimate LMP2 Oreca and Peugeot RD.jpg


“We’ve got some great plans to run championships and esports tournaments in the future and are building out functionality to create online championships and more,” reads the platform’s newly published FAQ. Did someone say a 24 Hours of Le Mans special event?

Outside of the online competitions, you will be able to use a system called Race Weekend to configure single-player events to your liking, including multi-class races. However, it’s not yet clear if multiplayer will be available initially with multi-class or driver swaps.

Co-op Mode, VR, Missing – For Now​

Speaking of switching drivers, the much-hyped asynchronous cooperative multiplayer mode is an absentee for now.

“Unfortunately, whilst we do have a working prototype, this innovative game mode is not quite ready for release and such we are working hard on this feature with the intent on making it available in the summer during the Early Access phase,” explains the development team.

Perhaps more pertinently, considering rFactor 2’s support, virtual reality is not available in February, but we expect it to follow. It’s not clear if triple-screen gameplay is possible come the launch, either.

Cadillac Le Mans Ultimate onboard.jpg


There’s no word at all if a form of single-player career or championship mode is in development. As an officially licenced and dedicated platform, much like Assetto Corsa Competizione, modding is not supported.

The recommended PC specifications have also been published. We have more details in a separate article, but they seem very accessible to us.

Pricing confirmed​

Those who take the plunge and purchase Le Mans Ultimate on 20th February 2024 as an Early Access title should expect to pay €29.99/£24.99/ $32.99 (USD).

The initial offering for the game will be the lowest price for the game in its Early Access phase,” explains the creators.


“Those early adopters will enjoy playing the game early with access to features and content, whilst also helping input into the future roadmap of the product with new features and updates being delivered to players when they are ready as part of the initial price.

“We also hope to even have a few gifts or two throughout Early Access.”

An estimation of how long it will be in this development phase is not yet known.

What do you make of the switch to the Early Access programme for Le Mans Ultimate? Let us know in the comments below and discuss in our forum.
About author
Thomas Harrison-Lord
A freelance sim racing, motorsport and automotive journalist. Credits include Autosport Magazine, Motorsport.com, RaceDepartment, OverTake, Traxion and TheSixthAxis.

Comments

Premium
Interesting that something that is done by basicly all developers these days is considered as a scam by some people in the community. I remember some other titles releasing with alot less content than LMU wich wasn't such a big issue for Kunos fans. And I didn't get all promised features in other titles either at lauch nor at all, so I still have a hard time understanding why S397 get's treated in a different way. What makes them different that they aren't allowed to use an EA phase to iron out teething issues or implement features that didn't make it day 1? Just because they have the parent company called MSG? At this price I see it as a bargain considering what I get for the same amount of money in other titles. In AMS2 I have to pay 30 Euros to just get Le Mans, three LMDh cars and three GTEs. Even the rF2 DLCs are expensive in comparison to this title.
I don't think early accessis a scam, many people like it to get the game early and the price is certainly good assuming it reaches a final state..
We know its none of those things but how they came about from a company with a bad record. Last month it has a release date for a presumed final product, now it is EA with many features missing. They knew that the game had zero chance being ready and somehow thought that they could say it would be released ready.
It's not a minor turn, its quite a misrepresentation from a company that people have lost trust in.

Most companies are coming out early saying that they will have their product out for early release, its what they should have said in december.
 
Reskin = should be cheaper, usually isn't though
Early Access = should be cheaper than full release, and it usually is

I am not surprised about the price. I am surprised it's early access, because I was under the impression it's a glorified reskin. If one reskins a 10+ year game, it's strange that it goes into early access, thus the assumption that it might be more than a glorified reskin. We will see.

Ahh ok, I see what you mean now. I was just missing the middle bit. That makes sense, yeah.
 
I expect them to announce that it is in the works, as I've said, I'm excited for this game but only for an offline WEC. Without confirmation that it is in the works, I can't purchase it in the hope that it is planned, that if it is announced as planned it will actually be delivered and if delivered it will be within a reasonable time. Early access needs to let me know so I can pay them money before what I want is delivered, this is why trust is so important with developers. They have a paying customer here.

Got your point.
It would be absolutely ridiculous if this game wouldn't get a SP championship mode in my opinion. Tbh...even in AMS2 I'm playing weekend races 90% or even more of the time. But this is rather due to some missing tracks to create a series like IMSA at the moment. To have all the content covered like in LMU, it would be so awesome and motivating to run a proper WEC season 23 and the 24 calendar in future.
 
I can see it now.

"This game is broken and borderline unplayable!!"

"It's in early access bro. Stop hating"

Maybe they will pull the old OG AMS2 excuse: "They are building the foundation...give it time"

Or the " It's a small developer" talking point.


I can't wait for this disaster to unfold and laugh at all the suckers WHO FELL FOR IT ..... AGAIN.
And your alternative to experience the full WEC calendar is wich? I suspect you are one of the guys still playing lowpoly GTR2 mods, pretend you are racing the real 24 Hours of Le Mans in iRacing after you have purchased one car and one track for the price of this EA and payed your sheep fee or you are pretending to have the same Le Mans experience in AC with AI that won't make it past Mulsanne straight in an acceptable manner and where you have to calculate the amount of laps on your own because the goddamn game doesn't support simple stuff like flying starts or timed races. Anyway, if you have a solution, I am ready to get smarter. :)
 
I can see it now.

"This game is broken and borderline unplayable!!"

"It's in early access bro. Stop hating"

Maybe they will pull the old OG AMS2 excuse: "They are building the foundation...give it time"

Or the " It's a small developer" talking point.


I can't wait for this disaster to unfold and laugh at all the suckers WHO FELL FOR IT ..... AGAIN.
Games I currently play, some already for many years… rF2, AMS2, AC, ACC… all games I bought in EA or Beta… so YES… I will fall for it again and have some FUN!
 
Got your point.
It would be absolutely ridiculous if this game wouldn't get a SP championship mode in my opinion. Tbh...even in AMS2 I'm playing weekend races 90% or even more of the time. But this is rather due to some missing tracks to create a series like IMSA at the moment. To have all the content covered like in LMU, it would be so awesome and motivating to run a proper WEC season 23 and the 24 calendar in future.
Exactly the same here, I'm even running IMSA in AMS2 now also haha. I substituted my favorite endurance tracks for those missing on AMS2 and cracked on with a championship anyway. Then usually spin out an hour into the first race anyway.

But that's what excited me about this LMU. We can use RF2 to do weekend races right now, I guess I'm just gutted, I didn't imagine that for a game about a championship I'd be unable to run a championship but you're right, early access didn't have this for other games - but they only just changed it from full game to early access at the last minute so I thin I'm justified in being disappointed.

Right now with AMS2 for championships and rF2 for race weekends, it leaves little reason to buy though I want to support the devs, I just can't keep shelling out money if develpers can't just tell me when I will have those SP championships. Then need to meet me half way. Right now I'd be paying 30 to try that sexy ferrari when I have cars in AMS2 and rF2 I haven't even driven yet anyway.
 
I don't think early accessis a scam, many people like it to get the game early and the price is certainly good assuming it reaches a final state..
We know its none of those things but how they came about from a company with a bad record. Last month it has a release date for a presumed final product, now it is EA with many features missing. They knew that the game had zero chance being ready and somehow thought that they could say it would be released ready.
It's not a minor turn, its quite a misrepresentation from a company that people have lost trust in.

Most companies are coming out early saying that they will have their product out for early release, its what they should have said in december.

I believe this is also related to their financial situation to keep cash somehow flowing. A balancing act to get not turn off the tap.

It's obviously less than expected but it could be perhaps a chance to get things done and right. I hope so.
 
Last edited:
I'm curious about the in race commentary, I tried running MP3's of real race commentary during races in AMS2 and it does add to the immersion, I know it's not realistic but it adds something which somehow connects you to the atmosphere of racing which is of value. I found an MP3 player called XMPlay which is incredibly system light so it can run in the background without affecting FPS at all. It's free.
 
Last edited:
I don't think early accessis a scam, many people like it to get the game early and the price is certainly good assuming it reaches a final state..
We know its none of those things but how they came about from a company with a bad record. Last month it has a release date for a presumed final product, now it is EA with many features missing. They knew that the game had zero chance being ready and somehow thought that they could say it would be released ready.
It's not a minor turn, its quite a misrepresentation from a company that people have lost trust in.

Most companies are coming out early saying that they will have their product out for early release, its what they should have said in december.
So S397 has a bad record? How so? If people don't learn to seperate between developer and publisher they will never learn to understand the difference between ACC and Limbo. I still listen to Machine Head even if I don't enjoy Dragon Force. People are so branded these days that it really makes me wonder if you guys take things for what they are and not what's written on the box?

Fact is, an EA release was never ruled out and continious development similar to ACC was allways the plan. That game released with far less content, no VR support, no championship mode and abysmal performance, wonky physics and bland FFB into early access. That people expect a fully finished game - something that hasn't been released in sim racing since allmost twenty years now - is simply the result of the imagination or expecation of those individuals, but it doesn't make it a truth. It's not evil MSG or S397, it's simply people and their minds.

And don't forget, noone is forcing anyone.
 
Premium
So S397 has a bad record? How so? If people don't learn to seperate between developer and publisher they will never learn to understand the difference between ACC and Limbo. I still listen to Machine Head even if I don't enjoy Dragon Force. People are so branded these days that it really makes me wonder if you guys take things for what they are and not what's written on the box?

Fact is, an EA release was never ruled out and continious development similar to ACC was allways the plan. That game released with far less content, no VR support, no championship mode and abysmal performance, wonky physics and bland FFB into early access. That people expect a fully finished game - something that hasn't been released in sim racing since allmost twenty years now - is simply the result of the imagination or expecation of those individuals, but it doesn't make it a truth. It's not evil MSG or S397, it's simply people and their minds.

And don't forget, noone is forcing anyone.

Don't misunderstand what my point is, it is not about S397 who seem like a good company that has done good work.
It is about MSG and the view people have of them. Would S397 being a good company screw things around like this? Most likely they are doing their best at the behest of MSG giving them deadlines that are not practical with resources that are not enough.

I am trying to give my view on why people see it like this and with MSG it is one thing after another culminating today with a change in the presumed final release to a very knocked back EA. Some companies certainly do get less sympathy than others even if they do the same thing, based on their history.

EA may be common these days, but unless you say you are doing it, there is still the presumption it will not be like that. The assumption is not it could be because 'they haven't ruled it out'
 
I'm beginning to understand why the marketing of this title has been a little threadbare until now, we've had a few screenshots, no proper in game footage but no proper big substance information until today. Whilst it seems strange to announce it's EA just 3 weeks away I can see why now, they're simply nowhere near close to a fully finished product which some of us wrongly presumed it would be on release and I'll hold my hand up to that.

So whilst it's disappointing that the good old EA excuse gets to be used again (its the trend for most games let alone race sims these days lets face it), this title clearly warrants it as they have no SP Champ or even VR support from the start to name two items that should be in V1.0.

Thinking on it more this evening and whilst enjoying the endurance content in AMS2 I've decided to go cold turkey on LMU, I'm gonna (try to) ignore it until the day I see VR has been added and in the meantime yes I will hope MSG don't go fully tits up, as that is still a very real possibility going on their financial situation year on year.

See you in the future LMU, hopefully.

#NoVRNoBuy
 
Premium
So S397 has a bad record? How so? If people don't learn to seperate between developer and publisher they will never learn to understand the difference between ACC and Limbo. I still listen to Machine Head even if I don't enjoy Dragon Force. People are so branded these days that it really makes me wonder if you guys take things for what they are and not what's written on the box?

Fact is, an EA release was never ruled out and continious development similar to ACC was allways the plan. That game released with far less content, no VR support, no championship mode and abysmal performance, wonky physics and bland FFB into early access. That people expect a fully finished game - something that hasn't been released in sim racing since allmost twenty years now - is simply the result of the imagination or expecation of those individuals, but it doesn't make it a truth. It's not evil MSG or S397, it's simply people and their minds.

And don't forget, noone is forcing anyone.
The problem is you can't separate S397 & MSG because MSG are the part that controls the money. It's well documented MSG are running on cash reserves and have stated in their earnings calls they need cash to survive long term. 2+2=4, they need cash to continue to operate so EA brings a cash injection and allows more time to find a further investment/buyer.
 
Btw.: I hope for the SP to be able to define the amount of cars per class. It's an important and indispensable feature. Something like in rF2 where you have to drop ai's to create equal qtys of cars per class is the pure hell.
 
The problem is you can't separate S397 & MSG because MSG are the part that controls the money. It's well documented MSG are running on cash reserves and have stated in their earnings calls they need cash to survive long term. 2+2=4, they need cash to continue to operate so EA brings a cash injection and allows more time to find a further investment/buyer.
Wich company doesn't need cash to operate? People make it sound like it's some voodoo science. My point is, this has nothing to do with this title being released as an EA product, nor does it tell anything about the quality of the product. We got similar EA releases with products that brought far less to the table and are in good shape now. So how about we relax wait till 20th of February and form an opinion based on the quality of the product when it's released instead of jumping to fast conclusions. People make it sound like MSG being the publisher of this titles will make it a failure by default wich nobody knows. The things that have been done with rF2 throughout 2023 have been very good. By that logic Racecontrol should have been a complete failure, wich isn't wasn't. It's a good feature and surprised most people in how good it works and how well it is supported.
 
Um, is there really no single-player? That's an instant no for me. I'll wait for more info on that I guess. Trailer looks good though, and there was a brief glimpse of the #33 Corvette C8.R.

I don't have VR so at the moment that's a non-factor for me.

Also, side note regarding the comments about Cadillac not using electric-only power exiting the pits at the Daytona 24 - there was definitely at least one stop while I was watching that they didn't. I noticed it and wondered if that would be a penalty, TV commentators didn't say anything about it and I haven't seen anything regarding it since, but it definitely happened at least once.
Sorry, I must have missed something. Why are people saying there will be no single player at all?

I mean, I get there will be no championship or career mode, but that's something else.

The article literally says
"Outside of the online competitions, you will be able to use a system called Race Weekend to configure single-player events to your liking, including multi-class races. However, it’s not yet clear if multiplayer will be available initially with multi-class or driver swaps."

Anyway, I had no intention to buy it on day one, so nothing changed for me.
 
And your alternative to experience the full WEC calendar is wich?
Thats the worst possible reply or reaction. Yes, lets defend something that already shows a lot of red flags simply because we don't have exactly the same type of game otherwise. No man, yours is the worst argument you can make for this game. If they would've announced an early access months ago then fine, but this here screams to me that the game development has been in trouble and now they have to release something. And because they don't want a shitshow they label it conveniently early acces. The last game that announced it won't be a full release but actually early access merely a week or two before release was The Day Before. The rest is history. So i definitely will not hold my breath for LMU as much as i would love a dedicated WEC racer.
 
Last edited:
Aren't we all a little overdramatic, whether we want to support LMU or not? Let's just wait until release, the YouTubers are surely going to have some content in time for release or shortly after, and we can all make our subjective informed decision whether it's worth it or not.
 
Sorry, I must have missed something. Why are people saying there will be no single player at all?

I mean, I get there will be no championship or career mode, but that's something else.

The article literally says
"Outside of the online competitions, you will be able to use a system called Race Weekend to configure single-player events to your liking, including multi-class races. However, it’s not yet clear if multiplayer will be available initially with multi-class or driver swaps."

Anyway, I had no intention to buy it on day one, so nothing changed for me.
The whole point of the game is simulating the entire season, to allow me to replicate a seasons championhsip. If they have the SP weekends working how hard is it to link it all together into a full championship?
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Thomas Harrison-Lord
Article read time
4 min read
Views
12,799
Comments
127
Last update

How are you going to watch 24 hours of Le Mans

  • On national tv

    Votes: 252 34.1%
  • Eurosport app/website

    Votes: 201 27.2%
  • WEC app/website

    Votes: 139 18.8%
  • Watch party

    Votes: 60 8.1%
  • At a friends house

    Votes: 18 2.4%
  • At Le Mans

    Votes: 69 9.3%
Back
Top