Kyuubeey
@Simberia
Likely a bit of that is due to a too stiff rear ARB.
I say so because it has very good exit acceleration (Anti-roll being beneficial to a trailing arm) but the entry handling is quite oversteery because the inside is likely unloading a bit. In my car, putting just a bit more rear ARB started being overall too oversteery for my tastes, even if it might have gained some absolute grip in acceleration, so it's a balancing trick. Possible also the front ARB is too soft, but I can't determine if that's the reason.
I wouldn't feel bad if someone called my 911s "turds" either because the inertia is off: they wouldn't be too wrong right now. But the thing is, the rest of my car is quite accurate.
The KS versions, not so. Front geo is entirely off to the point it's not even funny, rear in the Yellowbird is probably the most inaccurate thing in the entire sim, Yellowbird has a ton of extra rear tire grip to balance the handling, as I found out the ARBs and springs are completely off etc.
It's also been confirmed from other modders who are into the modern versions and have made some that they are entirely off as well. Not just a thing about the classics.
If those were mod cars, this opinion would be okay, and everyone would treat them with scrutiny. But because they're from a professional studio, somehow we need to watch our tongue. Even if you don't like it, I'm just saying how I see it to be.
I say so because it has very good exit acceleration (Anti-roll being beneficial to a trailing arm) but the entry handling is quite oversteery because the inside is likely unloading a bit. In my car, putting just a bit more rear ARB started being overall too oversteery for my tastes, even if it might have gained some absolute grip in acceleration, so it's a balancing trick. Possible also the front ARB is too soft, but I can't determine if that's the reason.
Your are doing good work and we are grateful for your contributions. You obviously feel passionate about making physic for cars in Kunos simulator.
Do you really need to use those comments, how would you like it to read from someone if they wrote the same about your efforts. You would probably pity them for having to be like that to feel better about themselves.
You are entitled to think your physic are better, but that does not make the work of a respected sim like Kunos what you just said.
We would like you better if you would show to other the respect that you are also hoping to get.
I wouldn't feel bad if someone called my 911s "turds" either because the inertia is off: they wouldn't be too wrong right now. But the thing is, the rest of my car is quite accurate.
The KS versions, not so. Front geo is entirely off to the point it's not even funny, rear in the Yellowbird is probably the most inaccurate thing in the entire sim, Yellowbird has a ton of extra rear tire grip to balance the handling, as I found out the ARBs and springs are completely off etc.
It's also been confirmed from other modders who are into the modern versions and have made some that they are entirely off as well. Not just a thing about the classics.
If those were mod cars, this opinion would be okay, and everyone would treat them with scrutiny. But because they're from a professional studio, somehow we need to watch our tongue. Even if you don't like it, I'm just saying how I see it to be.