You're rebuilding the E30 M3 susp? If so, good for you! When I first played AC I spent 100s of hours tweaking the setup to get it to behave remotely like in RL with a friend who also happens to be my mechanic. We probably have a combined 30 year experience with the E30 (all models) and got it to a point where it felt a bit like the real thing but somehow it always seemed to me like AC either did not model the rear axle correctly in terms of grip to sudden lift off due to the semi trailing arm or the geometry and spring/damper values are to blame (which were completely wrong).
If you're looking for beta testers let me know I'll be happy to give it a drive, also happy to share my setups which are mostly aimed at the GroupA as that is pretty close to a few tracktool E30 M3 Evo conversions we had experience with.
Either way, rock on and thanks for spending time on this!
Sweet, yeah I'm redoing the whole car eventually.
I'll probably just release an early version with just my susp, inertia, tires etc. Try it out and holler. Got a lot of data so it will get as close as my understanding gets. Same method for rear as the Porsche 964 and Ruf Yellowbird which are both quite well done IMO. At least, curves line up very reasonably in a +-50mm range. After about 50mm droop every trailing arm I've made has too much negative camber: but when do you get into 50mm droop?
And quite close in compression.
Here is some data from an older build. Right now redoing cus I found a schematic from above, showing the placements orthographically. I was almost bang-on.
Camber
172, 405 = -0.275, -0.69
147, 380 = -1.15, -1.30
122, 355 = -2.0, -1.99 REF
97, 330 = -2.875, -2.82
72, 306 = -3.725, -3.72
Toe
172, 405 = 0.31, 0.30
147, 380 = 0.24, 0.26
122, 355 = 0.23, 0.23
97, 330 = 0.26, 0.26
72, 306 = 0.36, 0.37
Also roll center height, (Maybe travel to some extent) and longitudinal IC position are (more) correct while also having these curves. I bet I can get the curves almost 100% but it will ruin the other dynamics, so this is our compromise.
I suspect the KS suspensions have a way different camber curve from IRL especially in droop.
EDIT:
Matched closer to a schematic. As close as I care to go, it ain't getting better. RC and all is intact.
Camber
229, 501 = -0.275, -0.61
204, 476 = -1.15, -1.24
179, 451 = -2.0, -1.99 REF
154, 426 = -2.875, -2.83
129, 402 = -3.725, -3.79
Toe
229, 501 = 0.31, 0.31
204, 476 = 0.24, 0.26
179, 451 = 0.23, 0.23
154, 426 = 0.26, 0.25
129, 402 = 0.36, 0.36