Anyone getting this / the red pop up top left of the screen in red.
Don't seem to make any difference the #AI on track
Don't seem to make any difference the #AI on track
Look at the fps though and remember that my 1070 is dying at 3440x1440. He's at 2560x1080!From these points of view your 8700k makes light work of this compared with my 6600k.
Look at the fps though and remember that my 1070 is dying at 3440x1440. He's at 2560x1080!
But yep, from 6xxx to 7xxx there was a light jump and the the 8xxx finally leaped forwards with 5+ GHz clockspeeds and 6 cores!
9xxx isn't that much better. Basically more expensive and a bit more performance... 8700k is just the best processor of the last few years!
They are cheaper at the moment. Not compared to when the 8700k wasn't ridiculously expensive.The 8700k has almost 0 advantage over the 9600k or even 8600k for gaming though, and both are $100+ cheaper.
They are cheaper at the moment. Not compared to when the 8700k wasn't ridiculously expensive.
They are basically the same price the 8700k but have no hyperthreading.
And while that's not really needed for gaming it's 50% boost for video rendering and other productive stuff. Keeping in mind that you might keep auch a processor for a very long time you just won't know what you'll gonna use it for.
Bs, HT can improve some(many) games +20-40% fps (when Gpu arent bottlenecking).
Win10 uses much better HT threads than over decade old Win7.
Absolutely right! In the current situation I wouldn't recommend the 9700k or 9900k for gaming. Even for occasional video work etc I would always recommend the 9600k!I mean, just go look at benchmarks and real world frame rates in tests:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5-9600k-coffee-lake-cpu,5922-6.html
The biggest advantage I see in any game they tested is 7 fps. Many are less than 1 fps different.
Absolutely right! In the current situation I wouldn't recommend the 9700k or 9900k for gaming. Even for occasional video work etc I would always recommend the 9600k!
I just wanted to say that since the 8700k did cost basically the same but got hyperthreading on top and if just slightly overclocked reaches the sarme frequencies, it was a "better" package overall.
I really hope the ryzen 3xxx will reach similar single thread performances as the Intel's. Finally a real competition for gaming, especially Sims which sadly still barely use more than 4 cores/threads...
98% on gaming "HT" tests says it wont affect at all. I say 98% of those tests are GPU bottlenecked.
After that you cant get more fps even at 1000 cores and 50000Mhz CPU becouse GPU cant draw any faster=more fps!
But to this topic, I today tested ACC CPU (9900K@5400Mhz, RAM 4500Mhz cl17) total usages on lower resolution, 1920x1080. I have 3440x1440 resolution monitor.
All tests same situation, 28 AI, Monza startline before rolling (back-straight, approx 20-30s when camera rolling on visible cars), i was #12 driver.
C = Core count
T = Thread count (=true cores + HT cores)
4C4T - 85-100%
4C8T - 46-69%
6C6T - 61-84%
6C12T - 34-59%
8C8T - 45-71%
8C16T - 22-34%
You all can see that 4C8T (=8 threads) has almost identical CPU usage than 8C8T (=8threads), so threads total count means more than just pure core count. Its UE4 engine.
So, yours gaming CPU, baby 9600K is totally bottleneck when its default clocks, i assume it hit 100% usage, at least my 2080Ti (2000+Mhz/16Gbps Vram).
Remember that all my tests are driven CPU@5400Mhz.
With 6 cores and 12 threads due to hyperthreading I thought?My printscreens are made with 6 cores and minimum sale 70. But maybe are you talking about 9600k processor
We aren't panicking about anything. At least not here, further down the thread.Not sure what you guys are panicking about or trying to prove to each other. Kunos has already stated that their focus was on stability and now the re-write is in the main out of the way they can focus on optimisation. Ya'll need to relax.
Thanks a lot for these! Your GPU has lots of headroom in these screens and your 8700k doesn't get used to more than 37% overall load. Shows that 12 CPU threads are definitely not necessarysome printscreen with scaling 70