Thank you for your constructive criticism. I will definitely use your recommendations. I was very disappointed by the previous commentator. Such reviews, without explanation, are very demotivating."Muvz
optimization has been carried out. everything is fine on my computer. I probably shouldn't post my work here. I'm really sorry that the track disappointed you."
No, optimization has not been carried out, at least in any significant amount. It runs okay on my computer but that does not mean it is optimised at all. The DIP is in excess of 10,000! I only took 30 seconds to inspect the track and you have grandstand seats as single objects. The first step you should take is combine these single seat objects into groups (keep triangle/face count of the groups below 60,000). In blender or 3ds max this is very simple, if you do not know how then google it or ask for advice here. After that, look for other objects that might be worth combining too (careful of objects that might break though). These are the first steps into optimising and the guys here will be more than willing to help if you need it.
Also, don't be upset by what people say. Okay your first review wasn't great, but you can take it as constructive and put a positive spin on it.
And also, thanks for sharing! We really do appreciate your work
Are you reproaching me for putting this work on public display in vain? In fact, I wanted to please the community with a new track that has never been in any simulator. Moreover, I do not ask for money or even donations for this. I am open to constructive criticism, but I find such low ratings unfair and demotivating.It was not at all a denigrating criticism on the contrary. I just wanted to give you my testimony about my experience on your track. There must be dozens of guys like me who see the same thing in terms of performance. And the kind of criticism I bring brings improvements on your part or from someone more competent to find a solution. Sorry you take it that way but you shouldn't, especially if you're exposing your work to the community.
I said we were going to find a solution, it's proof that it was just to tell you that you are doing a bad job
Oulala no, you read half of my messages? Let's see, I tell you that the job is great, but your optimization is not good, since your circuit takes a lot of resources. Another member comes to give you a more precise help because more experienced in the appropriate vocabulary. You quickly get offended, my friend, when there is no reason. Or my translator doesn't work very well and so you understand the opposite of what I mean.
OK. You can open the models.ini file and delete text:
That's it, you've found what pumps resource. Thank you for this trick. You can clearly see the difference on the screen between with and without the grandstand.
This is great news. It won't be difficult to fix it.
1.01 Optimization of the main grandstand has been made.
Thanks for this. I didn't get a chance to try the initial version but am getting a steady 90fps in VR with 1.01
Thanks for the message. I will try to fix it.
